Who believe, in all kinds of things(God maybe?). The following persons in the film have all spoken at RSE and sold books there. [9] In his review, Dave Kehr of The New York Times described the "transition from quantum mechanics to cognitive therapy" as "plausible", but stated also that "the subsequent leapfrom cognitive therapy into large, hazy spiritual beliefsisn't as effectively executed. And while I dont think supersymmetric GUTs are anywhere near as promising as many people seem to think, they are a much saner idea than many that dominate research these days (take the Landscape, please). ft. indoor riding arena once used for horse training which was refurbished and floored . Sol. It sounds reasonable, and familiar. 4000 volunteers regularly meditated to achieve a 25% drop in violent crime by the end of summer. Yet, the battle still ranges, and we now know where we can class the distinctions of LQG and String theorists? kazakore (kazakore) January 14, 2010, 6:30pm #10 But whenever one is dealing with highly speculative ideas that have no connection with experiment, theres a danger of becoming delusional and thinking that youre doing real science when youre not. In addition to the films three directors, there were actors and others involved in the production who are long time students of Ramthas School of enlightenment. Whether or not you buy into its "you are God in the making" philosophy, "What the Bleep Do We Know?" The movie "What the Bleep do we know" How much is true, or just entertainment. Many religions and spiritual paths--from Hinduism, with its concept of maya, to Christian Science--teach that appearance is illusion. 19802023 The Christian Science Monitor. Moreover, assume that they want your money. Some movies are so bad, they're funny. subscription. But to insist, as one on-screen interviewee does, that the material world around us is just one "possible movement of consciousness" undermines the possibility of any objective, external reality--something fundamental to many religions and to science. They're coming into the marketplace hungry for direction, but they don't want some person who claims to have all the answers. ", Critics offered mixed reviews as seen on the film review website Rotten Tomatoes, where it scored a "Rotten" 34% score with an average score of 4.6/10, based on 77 reviews. Film / What the #$*! But sounding like magic and being magic are two different things. Also, the movie suggests that the quantum idea of matter embracing all its possible states at once applies to the larger world of people and rocks. The film surpassed all expectations; it was certainly the stupidest thing I can remember seeing in a movie theater, and thats saying quite a lot (I see a lot of movies). Monitor journalism changes lives because we open that too-small box that most people think they live in. What the Bleep Do We Know? | Not Even Wrong - Columbia University Never mind that the movie didnt even have a plot. You might think that meant there were 18% fewer violent crimes than in the previous year, but the decrease was actually relative to his predicted increase based on some fancy statistical footwork. They don't go anywhere, Fred. "[20], Journalist John Gorenfeld, writing in Salon, notes that the film's three directors are students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment, which he says has been described as a cult. A classic experiment on visual processing involves asking people to watch a video of 6 people passing a basketball, and press a button every time a particular team has possession. Perhaps that is why they couldnt see them. Bleep was conceived and its production funded by William Arntz, who co-directed the film along with Betsy Chasse and Mark Vicente; all three were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. "I begin the book with a quote from Feynman that says, 'Reality takes precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled,'" he told me. For many years in the early-mid-eighties, the Maharishi was pushing N=8 supergravity as the unified field theory, I remember a colorful poster explaining how it agreed exactly with his philosophy that many people posted on their walls. Where were we now? But they add that the film shows quantum mysteries selectively to shore up metaphysical points. and published a study guide. What The Bleep!? Down The Rabbit Hole | Documentary Heaven We hear more and more from JZ Knight, a woman channeling the ancient warrior Ramtha, a chap who (through Knight) incidentally leads the Ramtha School of Enlightenment. A group of 3 Indian people claiming to be direct disciples of Maharishi Mahesh-Yogi visited our high school. One has already been recognized: If we do carefully prepare quantum systems, and keep them isolated, we can perform quantum magic technologically potentially on scales that we haven't been able to do before. [13] The American Chemical Society's review criticizes the film as a "pseudoscientific docudrama", saying "Among the more outlandish assertions are that people can travel backward in time, and that matter is actually thought. What The Bleep Do We Know - Wakelet Answer (1 of 6): Although not being as well educated in the area as Professor Wacker, I think it's overly simplistic to suggest the subjects raised in the movie to be either factual or "almost completely mumbo-jumbo". [8], In the Publishers Weekly article, publicist Linda Rienecker of New Page Books says that she sees the success as part of a wider phenomenon, stating "A large part of the population is seeking spiritual connections, and they have the whole world to choose from now". Do We Know!? It's hard to say where Candace Pert got the low-down on what the Native American Indians did or didn't see when Columbus and the gang hit the horizon. Interspersed with the plot were interviews with various supposed scientists with something to say about quantum physics, consciousness, God, etc. Evidently Albert claims he was taken advantage of, that his interview was heavily edited to misrepresent his views. Dr Joe Dispenza (the one who creates his day) has gone to court and testified that his teacher (ramtha) has told him that terrible times are coming and that he needs to protect his family. ft. house now used as offices), the Great Hall (a converted 15,375 sq. Unfortunately, it also completely misunderstands it. Doesn't the quantum world pervade everything that we see around us? Krauss worries that a lot of people can be fooled by appeals to the admittedly weird world of quantum physics a world in which particles are said to take every possible path from point A to point B, in which the position and velocity of particles are necessarily cloaked in uncertainty, in which the mere act of observation changes the thing being observed. Invariably only about half the people tested ever notice a woman in a gorilla suit walking across the middle of the screen during the game. I mean listen, you have very reputable individuals who believe in validation, as experimental proof. [17] Eric Scerri in a review for Committee for Skeptical Inquiry dismisses it as "a hodgepodge of all kinds of crackpot nonsense," where "science [is] distorted and sensationalized". Producing, scripting, and co-directing the film, What the BLEEP went on to become a global phenomenon, with well over 100 million viewers experiencing the BLEEP. Use these social-bookmarking links to share What the bleep are they on about?. In a corrupt, greed-fueled world, a powerful alchemist leads a Christ-like character and seven materialistic figures to the Holy Mountain,. While Amanda waits for a commuter train, she (and we) are shown the work of Japanese scientist Masaru Emoto, who has photographed water after exposing it to different emotions. HCI president Peter Vegso stated that in regard to this book, "What the Bleep is the quantum leap in the New Age world," and "by marrying science and spirituality, it is the foundation of future thought."[5]. Not exactly, Amit. Im not personally familiar with any of Hagelins work but Im sure theres some good physics in there. What the #$*! to someone you know:
Is the movie What The Bleep Do We Know? factual or mumbo jumbo - Quora : Down the Rabbit Hole: Directed by William Arntz, Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente. What the Bleep Do We Know!? - Rotten Tomatoes When a movie gets rave reviews as a mind-blowing flick about quantum physics, it's worth checking out. Is this a hoax to promote positivity? He also has been marketing several products within the school and its followers. Nobody does.". And you'd do the study without knowing what had been 'said' to the water specimens, so your subjective opinions wouldn't colour the results. [12][13] Lisa Randall refers to the film as "the bane of scientists". What The Bleep Do We Know? . Debunked. - Renoise Forums Well, people are able to undergo various transformations. What Does The Movie "What The Bleep Do We Know" Mean? | Teaching of In addition to the films three directors, there were actors and others involved in the production who are long time "students" of Ramthas' School of enlightenment. John Haglin During the resulting chat, two men carrying a wooden door passed between the stranger and the subjects. Even skeptics concede that we humans can fall into destructive thought patterns and need to cleanse our vision of what's real. Gripping stuff, but nothing to do with our daily lives. Check my single page unpublishable http://dftuz.unizar.es/~rivero/research/simple.pdf. Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Down the Rabbit Hole. Q. We will write a custom Essay on Philosophy Meaning of Arntz's Movie "What the Bleep Do We Know" specifically for you. you refer to the offspring of hep-ph/9803315. Directors William Arntz, Betsy Chasse Starring Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie Genres Science Fiction, Comedy, Drama, Documentary, Fantasy, Special Interest When you hear the term "quantum consciousness," you should be suspicious. Mark was born in Johannesburg, South Africa . 5.Miceal Ledwith a clergyman with a rather dubious past (see http://unison.ie/irish_independent/stories.php3?ca=36&si=770458&issue_id=7565) is the one chosen by the film makers to be the theological spokesman. FILM IN REVIEW; 'What the Bleep Do We Know?' Scientists in the physical realm also hypothesize that matter is solid (Wilson 5). 2. Right now they use a key that's based on the products of large prime numbers, and no computer could determine the prime factors in a time shorter than the age of the universe. It was one of the most important moments in history. Right after the Velvet Revolution in 1989 (the collapse of the Czechoslovak communism), many new spiritual and other directions were trying to find their ways to the new free countries. While many of its interviewees and subjects are professional scientists in the fields of physics, chemistry, and biology, one of them has noted that the film quotes him out of context. But that still doesn't mean that, at a global level, the weirdness of quantum mechanics is manifest. What the Bleep Do We Know!? | Movies | The Guardian Our mind has enormous potential, but we only use a small part of it for conscious thought, and we miss a lot of what's going on around us so, in a leap of creatively edited logic 3. Simon Singh called it pseudoscience and said the suggestion "that if observing water changes its molecular structure, and if we are 90% water, then by observing ourselves we can change at a fundamental level via the laws of quantum physics" was "ridiculous balderdash". IE 11 is not supported. What the Bleep Do We Know!? Not everything is possible. On the whole they were a bunch of complete flakes, although one of them (David Albert) is a philosopher of science here at Columbia. It's certainly not. Neither of them convincingly achieve this. Particles embracing all possible states until they are forced by an experiment to assume one state, one particle being in two adjacent places simultaneously, the inability to precisely measure a particle's position and momentum at the same time - these are just a few of the weird manifestations of quantum physics. Miceal Ledwith Heisenberg basically says you can't get a really accurate fix on both the position and the momentum of a subatomic particle say an electron at the same time. Questions about What the Bleep Do We Know? : askscience 3. With Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, Barry Newman, Armin Shimerman. extrapolates from quantum physics to answer life's big questions. "The movie is saying that somehow we can all get together and, with our collective thought processes, we can influence the outcome" of physical events - be they life experiences or scientific. You can't bring good things to you by thinking about them. So does classical physics. He says he is "profoundly unsympathetic to attempts at linking quantum mechanics with consciousness".[1]. A disproportionate amount of time was given in voice and film to Ramtha, Dr. Joe dispenza, and Miceal Ledwith. Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed and 2. There are lots of things in quantum mechanics that sound like magic. Hambling says it is likely that both the Hughes account and the story told by Pert were exaggerations of the records left by Captain Cook and the botanist Joseph Banks. But we behave like classical objects for a reason: We're big, we have lots of particles, they interact. 16 Quotes From the Movies ideas - Pinterest It went on to say that "Most laypeople cannot tell where the quantum physics ends and the quantum nonsense begins, and many are susceptible to being misguided," and that "a physics student may be unable to convincingly confront unjustified extrapolations of quantum mechanics," a shortcoming which the authors attribute to the current teaching of quantum mechanics, in which "we tacitly deny the mysteries physics has encountered". Now I don't have an automatic prejudice against 35,000-year-old warriors from Atlantis or the women who channel them. But how are ordinary mortals to judge its assertions about the nature of matter, mind, and the universe? Lawrence Krauss: I think it's probably one of the most abused concepts in physics among the public. "[3] It offers alternative spirituality views characteristic of New Age philosophy, including critiques of the competing claims of stewardship among traditional religions [viz., institutional Judaism, Christianity, and Islam] of universally recognized and accepted moral values. Short Range Tests of Newtons Inverse-Square Law. What the bleep are they on about? Science Features (ABC Science) There was some sort of plot involving a woman photographer (played by Marlee Matlin), who wanders around and has anxiety attacks. What the Bleep Do We Know!? (2004) - 3663 Words | Movie - Free Essays If I didnt know any better, I would have thought it was something straight out of a Cheech and Chong movie. Moreover, the movie proposes no plausible physical mechanism by which thoughts influence matter. ", "The movie is saying that somehow we can all get together and, with our collective thought processes, we can influence the outcome" of physical events - be they life experiences or scientific experiments, notes Bruce Schumm, a particle physicist at the University of California at Santa Cruz. Beliefnet is a lifestyle website providing feature editorial content around the topics of inspiration, spirituality, health, wellness, love and family, news and entertainment. improve functionality and performance. The movie contains interviews from such leaders in their fields as: Candace. 1. " !" | (1080p These photos may well be art they're sure as hell not science. 1. During our current Covid19 pandemic, this collection is highly relevant to a world still seeking novel answers to the human condition and also drawn to old theories long ago debunked. Therefore people get the notion that there's no objective reality, and that you can literally impact on the external world just by doing things internally. Thus, if a scientist repeats an experiment with subatomic particles often enough, the results will closely match the probabilities quantum theory predicts. Presentations ranging from "The Secret" to "What the Bleep Do We Know?" The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle argues that its impossible to track the momentum and position of a subatomic particle. Everyone knows quantum mechanics is weird, so why not use that to justify it? MOVIE: What the #$*!(bleep) do we know | Physics Forums 7. Down The Rabbit Hole\". Author, speaker, and award-winning Writer/Director/Producer Mark Vicente was part of the creative team behind the sleeper hit "What The Bleep Do We Know?!". http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith (accessed: April 20, 2009)A note about Fred Wolf's qualifications: He has a Ph.D in Theoretical Physics from UCLA in 1963, although he has not worked in laboratory endeavours since that time. And if you're a modern thinker you'll know for a fact that quantum physics is wacky stuff. But quantum-mechanical computers might be able to, and then of course we'd have to start thinking about how to make things more secure. Interviews with scientists and authors, animated bits, and a storyline involving a deaf photographer are used in this docudrama to illustrate the link between quantum mechanics, neurobiology, human consciousness and day-to-day reality. If your mind is the "observer" that quantum physics talks about, you should be able to choose which of the many possible realities around you comes into existence you can create your own reality, and probably come off anti-anxiety medication to boot. Those points suggest that quantum-derived "possibilities" affect the wider world, that human thought is the ultimate arbiter of physical reality, and that by manipulating thought properly, people can achieve harmony and even shape the structure of matter. It's more like a collision in the editing room between talking heads, an impenetrable human parable and a hallucinogenic animated cartoon. If it were manifest, you could run at a wall a lot of times, and every now and then you'd spontaneously appear on the other side of the wall. 'What the Bleep Do We Know?' : An insult to science and spirituality Next factoid: Crime in Washington, D.C. was reduced 25 percent by prayer--and made believers of the D.C. cops! "[5] The same article quotes Bill Pfau, Advertising Manager of Inner Traditions, as saying "More and more ideas from the New Age community have become accepted into the mainstream. The film's central point--that reality is a construct of our own brains--seems rife with intriguing cinematic possibilities. With Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie, Robert Bailey Jr.. A fictional photographer's quest to spiritually rediscover herself is interspersed with documentary footage of scientists and theologians discussing the philosophical aspects of quantum physics. 2004 ( ) ( ) Offline 2013. But most of the talking heads' quotes seem either to have a hidden agenda, or to be sliced and diced to buttress Ramtha's ideas. based on this subject nature contained, I hold these 2 films in a very high regard. (commonly referred to by its spoken title What the Bleep Do We Know) is a 2004 pseudoscientific film that supports the idea that consciousness and quantum mechanics are somehow related. In the film, during a discussion of the influence of experience on perception, Candace Pert notes a story, which she says she believes is true, of Native Americans being unable to see Columbus's ships because they were outside their experience. But I start to choke on my $8 popcorn when science is manipulated to make a cult leader's claims sound more plausible. The meditation may not have helped the victims of violent crime, but it did win Hagelin the 1994 Ig Nobel Peace Prize. One other area where quantum mechanics works on a macroscopic scale is in superconductivity and superfluidity. Isnt that a bit like attacking algebra because of Serge Langs nutty ideas about HIV and AIDS? All the weirdness of quantum mechanics gets washed out on the scale that we can experience. "What the Bleep do we Know?! is garbage | Naked Science Forum Guess that could not have been done to easily in the Catholic church. (2005)", "Cult Science Dressing Up Mysticism as Quantum Physics", "The New Age Spiritualist and the Old School Scholars", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know!%3F&oldid=1139210194, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, That the universe is best seen as constructed from thoughts and ideas rather than from. With Alejandro Jodorowsky, Horacio Salinas, Zamira Saunders, Juan Ferrara. But are there new, weird applications that people might see that have an impact on everyday life, beyond the woo-woo? But that doesn't mean that astrology is true. So on one hand you have a threat to security, and on the other you have a possible boon for security. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser. Q: You do see that in some science . Q: But isn't everything really connected? It's actually the machine that's the observer, not the human who's jotting down results. Do We Know!?) Remembering The Isheagu Massacre Of May 1968 - Politics - Nigeria The researchers' bottom line: Quantum physics is about matter at its most fundamental levels and matter's interactions; it's not about spirituality. Do we know" . What the Bleep Do We Know? (It's all to do with photons of light from your measuring instrument hitting the poor electron and knocking it for six). (Refugees in Sudan or people in Baghdad would have an even tougher time accepting the film's premise.). !" is a radical departure from convention. [1], In mid-2005, the filmmakers worked with HCI Books to expand on the film's themes in a book titled What the Bleep Do We Know! "We only see what we believe is possible Native American Indians on Caribbean Islands couldn't see Columbus's ships [sitting on the horizon] because they were beyond their knowledge" Dr. Candace Pert (former scientist, current new-age guru) in What the Bleep Do We Know? Critical Analysis of 'What The Bleep Do We Know' Part 1 Seven Times Planet TV Studios Went Way Too Far - Rendicin de Cuentas My FIL is a ex-Air force Pilot. Use this form to email 'What the bleep are they on about?' That movie started its life as a small documentary about Spirit and Science, but grew in scope (and budget) and became What the BLEEP Do We Know!? [6], The Institute of Noetic Sciences, a New Age research organization that "explores phenomena that do not necessarily fit conventional scientific models", has supported What the Bleep Do We Know!? It's recognized as pedagogical exaggeration. To accomplish that, you would have to invoke "new physics," Dr. Schumm says, in which the explanation can be verified or falsified through experiment.